Art History Essay -- William Hogarth, Hogarthian Style

The Hogarthian style, is believed to have laid the foundation of the Rococo era also referred to as Late Baroque, its use of simplistic shell like shapes to promote colloquialisms of ornamental symmetry. Use of intercut design within portraiture ,providing smooth and consistent brush strokes in order to provide a precise depiction of the narrative , presenting subtle elements of eroticism in order to express a sense of playfulness and elegance of the era . Use of drapery to complement the bodily composition for each character , the use of broad and subtle emotional states express aspects of classicism such as contrapposto to provide bodily composition to create a sense of dynamics o... ... middle of paper ... ...to maintain the balance. While the other resides at her waist complementing her feminine figure. Such emphasis on bodily composition and femininity , contributes to the satirical elements of the Rococo era, presenting such sexual themes in order to emphasize that the woman presented wishes for the embrace of financial security. Hoping that a beloved gentlemen well arrive in order to provide her a substantial future. But also infers the common trend of the era was infidelity , usually portrayed through scandals, that commoners engaged the aristocracy, through acts of intercourse in order to satisfy the erotic needs of their superiors , either believing that the individual well be a worthy partner both economically and emotionally. Or simply she adopts the life style of a cortisone and or escort , simply using her physical beauty in order to implement clients.

Discuss the future of rhetoric in our electronic age Research Paper - 1

Discuss the future of rhetoric in our electronic age - Research Paper Example This means there is further evolution in store for rhetoric and it cannot become obsolete however, classical rhetoric may never regain its lost position. In this paper, rhetoric has been discussed from various aspects from its origin to evolution, post-modern theory of rhetoric and the challenges it faces from electronic media. From ancient times rhetoric has served as the perfect art of discourse, which allows a speaker/writer/researcher to enlighten, motivate and even persuade a given set of audience and/or readers. The need and significance of rhetoric as an effective form of art and a component of English studies has been realized from the time of Aristotle. However, with the onset of post-modern era a question mark has been added to its requirement since the electronic age and the gadget generation has left little room for discourse using classical rhetoric processes. Nonetheless, the future of rhetoric is something that remains to be analyzed properly without dangling into the argument of the legitimacy or illegitimacy of this art form in electronic era. In this paper, the future of rhetoric in our electronic age will be explored and an analysis will be made about its historical evolution and the challenges it faces today utilizing information from various scholarly sources. In simple words rhetoric is the assertion of â€Å"Eiro or I Say†. It is the â€Å"art of discourse,† or â€Å"art of speaking,† which has been practiced since ancient eras and was one of the three subjects of the Trivium (syllabus) of medieval universities the other two being Grammar and Logic. (Fishwick, 2007) The word Rhetoric has been derived from a Greek word â€Å"rhetorike† which denotes the â€Å"civic art† of public speaking since it was largely developed in deliberative public forums such as law courts. Rhetoric as a term was firstly used by Plato in his

Medical Law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 6500 words

Medical Law - Coursework Example In this regard, an individual’s right to self-determination is based on the individual’s capacity to exercise that right. In other words, autonomy and the right to self-determination are the ethical factors underlying what UK law accepts as capacity or competency.5 The law assumes outright that individuals have the capacity to consent to medical treatment. Under Section 1(2) of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, â€Å"a person must be assumed to have capacity unless it is established that he lacks capacity.†6 In other words, the capacity to consent is a rebuttable presumption, although healthcare professionals are required to start out with the presumption that all patients have the capacity to consent to medical treatment. The presumption of capacity to consent is not automatically denied minors. ... s it would be if he were of full age; and where a minor has by virtue of this section given an effective consent to any treatment it shall not be necessary to obtain any consent for it from his parent or guardian.7 It would therefore appear that the age of majority has been lowered to 16 in terms of determining the legal capacity to consent to or refuse medical treatment. However, Section 8(3) of the 1969 Act goes on to provide that Section 8 â€Å"shall not be construed as making ineffective any consent which would have been effective† in the event â€Å"this section had not been enacted†.8 It therefore follows that common law considerations relative to assessing capacity on the basis of the patient’s ability to process and understand information relative to medical treatment in a rational manner may be applied to all minors. Lord Scarman noted in Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authorit that fixing the age of minority at 16 was undesirable as it: Brings with it an inflexibility and a rigidity which in some branches of the law can obstruct justice, impede the law’s development and stamp on the law the mark of obsolescence where what is needed is the capacity for development.9 In other words, Lord Scarman felt that it was unrealistic to fix the age of development when many factors influenced a child’s level of maturity and thus the issue of whether or not a minor was in a position to understand the medical treatment proposed and thus make a rational decision about accepting or refusing to accept it. It therefore follows that capacity to consent to or refuse to submit to medical treatment is a subjective issue. Legal capacity to consent to medical treatment or medicine is not determined or fixed on the basis of the individual’s status. Therefore